MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W48522017

Ecosystemic forest management approach to ensure forest sustainability and socio-economic development of forest dependent communities: Evidence from Southeast Cameroon

2010· article· en· W48522017 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpenEdition (OpenEdition) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityForest managementGeographySustainable forest managementAgroforestryForestryEnvironmental resource managementEcologyEnvironmental science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Forests provide a full spectrum of goods and services that contribute to the socio-economic development of forest dependent communities. In tropical countries, the diversity of stakeholders depending on forests with their divergent interests and expectations, make sustainable forest management (SFM) difficult to achieve. Although several studies advocate the decentralization of forest management and public participation as important processes for SFM, little has been done to demonstrate how these processes could contribute to forest sustainability and socioeconomic development of forest dependent communities. Moreover, almost no seminal paper has demonstrated how to integrate the ecological, economical and social issues of forest management, which have nevertheless been recognized as essential for sustainable forest management. This study develops an ecosystemic forest management approach based on “Stakeholder-Resource-Usage-Institution” dynamics as an appropriate framework for ensuring forest sustainability and socio-economic development. This approach is supported with lessons drawn on the limitations and pitfalls of the traditional forest management approach in Southeast Cameroon.<br>Les forêts fournissent toute une gamme de biens et de services qui contribuent au développement socio-économique des communautés dépendantes de la forêt. Dans les régions tropicales, la diversité des parties prenantes qui dépendent des forêts rend la gestion durable des forêts difficile du fait d’attentes et d’intérêts divergents. Bien que plusieurs études estiment la décentralisation de la gestion des forêts et la participation publique comme importantes pour la gestion durable des forêts, peu d’initiatives ont été prises pour démontrer la manière dont ces actions pourraient contribuer à la durabilité de la forêt et au développement socio-économique des communautés dépendant de la forêt. En outre, aucun article majeur n’a démontré comment intégrer les aspects écologiques, économiques et sociaux de la gestion des forêts, qui ont pourtant été reconnus comme essentiels pour la gestion durable des forêts. Cette étude développe une approche de gestion écosystémique des forêts basée sur la dynamique « Partie prenante-Ressource-Utilisation-Institution » comme cadre pour assurer la durabilité des forêts et le développement socio-économique. Cette approche s’appuie sur les enseignements tirés des limites et des pièges de l’approche traditionnelle de gestion des forêts dans le sud-est du Cameroun.<br>Los bosques proporcionan un amplio espectro de bienes y servicios que contribuyen al desarrollo socioeconómico de las comunidades dependientes de los bosques. En países tropicales, la diversidad de las partes interesadas que dependen de los bosques con sus intereses y esperanzas divergentes, hace que la gestión forestal sostenible (GFS) sea difícil de lograr. Aunque varios estudios recomiendan la descentralización de la gestión forestal y la participación pública como procesos importantes para la GFS, se ha hecho muy poco para demostrar cómo estos procesos podrían contribuir a la sostenibilidad forestal y al desarrollo socioeconómico de las comunidades que dependen de los bosques. Además, casi ningún artículo de influencia ha demostrado cómo integrar las cuestiones ecológicas, económicas y sociales de la gestión forestal, algo que sin embargo ha sido reconocido como elemento esencial para la gestión forestal sostenible. Este estudio desarrolla un enfoque de la gestión forestal ecosistémica basado en la dinámica “Parte Interesada-Recurso-Uso-Institución” como un marco apropiado para asegurar la sostenibilidad forestal y el desarrollo socioeconómico. Este enfoque está respaldado por conocimientos basados en las limitaciones y dificultades del enfoque de la gestión forestal tradicional en el sudeste de Camerún.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.092
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it