MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W48581462 · doi:10.5555/2331751.2331753

Communications and power distribution network co-simulation for multidisciplinary smart grid experimentations

2012· article· en· W48581462 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnual Simulation Symposium · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSmart Grid Security and Resilience
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridCo-simulationComputer sciencePlug-inEvent (particle physics)Plug and playVoltageEmbedded systemGridSimulationReal-time computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multiple simulation tools have been built and studied independently in the communications and power system perspectives of IEEE P2030 to study new Smart Grid applications. However, very few studies have been done on co-simulation by combining both perspectives in a multidiciplinary manner. In this paper, we show implementation details of our novel communications and power distribution network co-simulator based on OMNeT++ and OpenDSS. We then demonstrate the novelty of our co-simulator by showing the impact of data rate-based and event-based sensors on reactive control algorithms of plug-in electric vehicles to reduce critical voltage durations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it