MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W49185626 · doi:10.7202/033041ar

Buttes cryogènes saisonnières de plages arctiques, péninsule de Tuktoyaktuk, Territoires du Nord-Ouest

2007· article· fr· W49185626 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Stéphane Campeau, Arnaud Héquette

Bibliographic record

VenueGéographie physique et Quaternaire · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalCenter for Northern Studies
Fundersnot available
KeywordsButteHumanitiesGeographyForestryArtArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Des buttes cryogènes saisonnières en système fermé ont été observées de 1991 à 1993 sur les flèches sableuses de la péninsule de Tuktoyaktuk, dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest. Les buttes ont une forme circulaire et convexe. Leur diamètre varie entre 5 et 15 m et leur hauteur, entre 15 et 25 cm. Le coeur des buttes est constitué d'une lentille de glace intrusive de même diamètre que les buttes. La lentille a une forme convexe et sa base est horizontale. L'épaisseur de la lentille est égale à l'élévation des buttes, soit entre 15 et 25 cm. Les buttes se forment dans une pseudo-dépression située entre la berme de tempête et la berme du rivage de la lagune. À la fin de l'été, les débordements de tempête saturent en eau de mer le sable des flèches. L'engel provoque un accroissement de la pression hydrostatique à l'intérieur de la dépression. Les lentilles de glace intrusive se développent ainsi en système fermé. Les buttes se forment au cours de l'hiver pour disparaître au cours de l'été suivant. La densité des buttes semble être fonction de la fréquence des débordements de tempête inondant les flèches entre la mi-août et la mi-septembre et des conditions d'engel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGéographie physique et Quaternaire→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→