MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W49513917 · doi:10.1155/2014/649465

Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Position Statement Regarding the Use of Thiopurines for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2014· article· en· W49513917 on OpenAlexaffabout
John K. Marshall, Anthony Otley, Waqqas Afif, Çharles N. Bernstein, Lawrence Hookey, Grigorios I. Leontiadis, Remo Panaccione, Brian Bressler

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityDalhousie UniversityQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityPopulation Health Research Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAzathioprineInternal medicineMercaptopurineUlcerative colitisGastroenterologyInflammatory bowel diseaseFamily medicineDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1Division of Gastroenterology and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario; 2Division of Gastroenterology & Nutrition, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia; 3Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec; 4Section of Gastroenterology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba; 5Division of Gastroenterology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario; 6Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta; 7Division of Gastroenterology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia Correspondence: Dr John K Marshall, Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West (2F59), Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1. Telephone 905-521-2100 ext 76782, fax 905-523-6048, e-mail marshllj@mcmaster.ca Received for publication June 4, 2014. Accepted June 9, 2014 The Canadian Association of Gastroenterology is issuing the present position statement to address concerns resulting from the recent Health Canada warning, “Imuran (azathioprine) or Purinethol (mercaptopurine) – association with a type of blood cancer – hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma – for health professionals” (Box 1) (1). While the alert does not contain new information, it informs clinicians of updates to the product labelling for azathioprine (Imuran, Triton Pharma Inc, Canada) and 6-mercaptopurine (Purinethol, Teva Canada Ltd, Canada) to include the association with the development of hepatosplenic T cell lymphoma (HSTCL). This serious cancer has been rare in Canada, with Health Canada reports including two cases (one fatal) with mercaptopurine and four cases with azathioprine (three fatal). Although these agents are not Health Canada-approved for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), they are frequently administered ‘off-label’ for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD). Many therapies are used off-label, particularly in pediatric patients (2,3). Other common therapies included in IBD management guidelines, such as corticosteroids (prednisone) and methotrexate, are similarly not authorized for this indication. This does not imply improper or contraindicated use, but rather that clinicians use their professional judgment and the best available evidence to weigh the risk:benefit ratio for an individual patient (3). The efficacy of thiopurine therapy in IBD is somewhat controversial. The Study of Immunomodulator Naive Patients in Crohn’s Disease (SONIC) (4) and UC SUCCESS (5) trials demonstrated that azathioprine in combination with an anti-tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) agent was superior to either agent alone in CD and UC for induction and maintenance therapy. These same studies suggest that azathioprine monotherapy is an inferior choice for induction and maintenance therapy in both UC and CD (4,5). Furthermore, recent studies have questioned the benefits of introducing thiopurines early in the disease course (6,7). However, in other trials, thiopurine agents have demonstrated benefits for steroid sparing and maintenance of remission (8-10). As a result, recent European and United States guidelines recommend thiopurines with or without anti-TNFs to maintain remission after failure of, or intolerance to, 5-aminosalicylic acid compounds (8-10). Efficacy must be balanced against safety and tolerability. Immunosuppression can be associated with an increased risk for cancer. Specifically, thiopurines are associated with a small but significant risk of lymphoma (including HSTCL) (8, 11) and nonmelanoma skin cancer (12). Although there is an increased relative risk for lymphoma with thiopurine therapy in IBD patients, the absolute risk is very low (11). Of note, some subgroups, such as elderly patients, may face a much higher absolute risk of thiopurine complications because of a higher baseline risk (13). Thiopurines are also associated with bone marrow suppression, hepatotoxicity, pancreatitis, allergic reactions and an increased risk for opportunistic infections, especially when used concomitantly with steroids or infliximab (8,9). The risks associated with thiopurine use, including those highlighted in the Health Canada alert, have been known to clinicians for some time and should be considered in their decision-making process. It is important to discuss both the risks and benefits of thiopurine therapy with patients to avoid uninformed decisions and abrupt discontinuation of therapy. Patients should be cautioned that treatment withdrawal among patients in stable remission on azathioprine has been associated with an increased risk for relapse (14). Clinicians should conduct routine discussions to ensure that patients are aware of the balance of risk and benefits of therapies as a standard part of care (15). This most recent Health Canada warning reinforces our responsibility to stay current with regard to the risk and benefits of the medications we prescribe. Taking this one step further, it is our duty to communicate these points to our patients. Some suggestions for effective communications to help patients make informed medical decisions include avoiding vague descriptive words (eg, rare, common), using multiple formats (eg, numbers, graphs, pictorial representations), using absolute as opposed to relative numbers, avoiding small percentages (eg, 0.06%, use 6 per 10,000 instead) and individualizing data whenever possible (15). Management decisions should be individualized. Continuation of therapy should balance the evidence for risk and efficacy against an individual patient’s response to therapy, preferences and risk tolerance. Some patients may have a higher risk tolerance than clinicians would predict (16). Therefore, it is important to have an open, individualized discussion and document this in the patient’s chart. Although events are relatively rare, clinicians must continue to be aware of the risk and counsel patients appropriately. position stAtement

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology and HepatologySame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207