Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syncope, or fainting, is a heterogeneous condition and hence difficult to diagnose. Treatments for syncope are vast and largely ineffective because individual variability impacts success. Research into the mechanisms and treatment of syncope has focused on adults, despite 15-25% of children experiencing episodes. Thus, we aimed to investigate syncope in children and adolescents and explore a non-pharmacological approach to its treatment. We conducted cardiovascular autonomic function testing (Valsalva manoeuvre, cerebral reactivity to hypo- and hypercapnia, and orthostatic stress testing) to evaluate cardiovascular factors predisposing to syncope in 21 children. We also evaluated the efficacy of graded calf compression stockings for the treatment of syncope in 15 young adults. We found that (1) autonomic function testing in children was appropriate, but current diagnostic criteria may need to be altered for paediatric populations; and (2) the utility of calf compression stockings to improve orthostatic tolerance is dependent on specific anthropometric variables.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".