MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W50188041

Popliteal venous aneurysm and iliofemoral thrombosis.

2008· article· en· W50188041 on OpenAlexaff
Lawrence M. Gillman, Robert McGregor

Bibliographic record

VenuePubMed · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular anomalies and interventions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePopliteal veinVenous thrombosisPulmonary embolismAneurysmLower limbs venous ultrasonographyRadiologyPopliteal arteryThrombosisSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Venous aneurysms are extremely rare, and most are incidental findings that have no major clinical significance. Popliteal venous aneurysms are an exception to this rule. Their presence is strongly associated with recurrent pulmonary embolism. To the best of our knowledge a popliteal venous aneurysm has never been reported as a cause of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. We report a case of iliac vein stenosis, which we hypothesize prevented the passage of an embolism from a popliteal venous aneurysm to the pulmonary circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePubMedSame topicVascular anomalies and interventionsFrench-language works237,207