MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W501890 · doi:10.4000/assr.25747

Bruxelles : un bastion libéral, franc-maçon et... féministe ?

2014· article· fr· W501890 on OpenAlexaff
Cathérine Jacques

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le féminisme s’est développé en parallèle avec la montée de la question ouvrière, et donc du projet de réforme sociale élaboré par les catholiques au tournant des xixe-xxe siècles. Un projet qui s’articule en grande partie sur le modèle familial. Dès le dernier quart du xixe siècle, les regards catholiques se tournent vers la femme, salvatrice d’un monde en perdition, tout particulièrement dans les grandes villes. À Bruxelles, l’évolution démographique et sociale s’oppose à cet idéal. L’émancipation croissante des femmes, leur accès à l’éducation, leur présence accrue sur le marché du travail, leur refus d’assumer une famille nombreuse... sont autant d’éléments à combattre. Vue sous cet angle, la grande ville n’est pas seulement un lieu de perdition, mais le lieu de confrontation entre deux modèles de société : l’un catholique et l’autre laïque.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.011
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.466
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207