MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W5049236 · doi:10.18174/26953

Smallholder seed practices : maize seed management in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico

2006· dissertation· en· W5049236 on OpenAlexfundno aff
L.B. Badstue

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural Innovations and Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsortium of International Agricultural Research CentersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsGermplasmAgricultural biodiversityAgricultureAgroforestryDiversity (politics)GeographyCrop diversityCropRelation (database)Agricultural scienceBusinessAgronomyBiologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceForestry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to contribute to an increased understanding of what is commonly referred to as 'local seed systems', 'farmer seed systems' or 'informal seed systems', both in relation to seed supply for agricultural production and in relation to the conservation of important crop genetic diversity. Within a general understanding of seed as an essential input for agricultural production, as well as a fundamental source of germplasm for crop improvement, this study offers a detailed analysis of smallholder maize seed practices among traditional farmers in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca, Mexico, a centre of maize genetic diversity.Using an actor-oriented approach as the point of departure, a series of aspects related to local maize seed management and transactions are examined and discussed, includingFarmers' seed practices as a form of local knowledge;The role of collective action in relation to crop genetic diversity conservation and seed supply at the local level;The social organization of seed supply; andFarmers' transaction costs in relation to seed acquisition.The study shows that smallholder maize seed practices in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca are complex and dynamic, spanning both conservation and innovation aspects. Local concepts relating to maize and maize seed practices are often flexible and negotiable, and small-scale experimentation in search of knowledge and practical solutions is an integral part of farming. The applications and dynamics that make up local maize seed practices in the study area appear to be negotiated on the basis of a set of shared views and conditions, which in themselves are based on the agro-ecological, cultural, and social environments in which these farmers operate.While each section of the book analyses a different problematic, shedding light on a particular aspect of local seed dynamics in the study area, together they complement each other and provide a basis for a deeper understanding of farmers' seed practices in the Central Valleys of Oaxaca. This in turn contributes to an improved understanding of local seed practices in a broader perspective and emphasizes the challenge for agricultural research of achieving synergies with local knowledge as the major driving force in local development processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.410
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAgricultural Innovations and PracticesFrench-language works237,207