MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W51054030 · doi:10.7202/028099ar

Collective Bargaining Results

2005· article· en· W51054030 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Douglas A. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueRelations industrielles · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic theories and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollective bargainingEconomicsWageWage bargainingInflation (cosmology)Bargaining powerProfit (economics)MicroeconomicsBargaining problemLabour economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The author of the following article discusses the relation-ship between inflation and collective bargaining. Collective bargaining cannot in a vacuum create inflationary wage increases. Rather, it is the interaction of mark-up or target-return pricing and profit-based wage demands that sets off the spiral of discretionary increases in wages and prices. In the author's opinion, it would be necessary to strive for intelligent methods of reducing the conflict between good industrial relations and a stable price level or face the consequences of the actions of those who seek to impose un-workable controls on the collective bargaining system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score0.233

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0700.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRelations industriellesSame topicEconomic theories and modelsFrench-language works237,207