Hockey interior: un deporte para personas con discapacidades psíquicas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este articulo queremos presentar un deporte nacido de la adaptacion del hockey sobre hielo, hecha a propuesta de S.O. Canada para mejorar el nivel de participacion en los campeonatos de invierno de Special Olympics. Con la adaptacion del suelo (cualquier pista deportiva), del material (stick y disco), proceso de aprendizaje, normativa tecnica, reglamentacion y la exclusion de los patines, nacio el hockey interior como un deporte colectivo de 6 jugadores en el campo con un minimo de 8 jugadores y un maximo de 11, que se juega en tres partes de 9 minutos con obligatoriedad de hacer cambios de jugadores cada 3 minutos. Deporte que ha dado y puede ofrecer aun mas la posibilidad de participacion a deportistas de muchos niveles y con limitaciones variadas, ya que es un deporte rapido, facil de aprender y muy alegre. Por todo ello se convertira en un futuro no muy lejano en un deporte como tal, asi como en un nuevo recurso didactico para todos los profesionales de educacion fisica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".