MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W51795594

Eye-tracker data filtering using pulse coupled neural network

2006· article· en· W51795594 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisInstitut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-PinelUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFilter (signal processing)Computer visionNoise (video)Artificial neural networkMedian filterPulse (music)Nonlinear filterEye trackingSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)SIGNAL (programming language)Pattern recognition (psychology)Filter designImage (mathematics)Image processingDetectorTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Data obtained from eye-tracker are contaminated with noise due to eye blink and hardware failure to detect corneal reflection. One solution is to use a nonlinear filter such as the median. However, median filters modify both noisy and noise free data and they are therefore difficult to use in real time applications. To overcome these limits, a simplified pulse coupled neural network (PCNN) is proposed to correctly detect and remove noisy data while leaving uncorrupted data untouched. Results indicated that a filter based on a PCNN achieved a much better performance than the median filter in peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and in visual inspection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.644
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.141
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it