Condensing the Media Mix: Multiple Possible Worlds in <i>The Tatami Galaxy</i>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article identifie quelques unes des distinctions générales dans les pratiques narratives transmédiatiques plus précisément entre ce qui, en Amérique du Nord, a été appelé la culture de la convergence des médias et ce qui est connu au Japon comme le media mix. Rédigé à partir d’une lecture de la série d’animation La galaxie Tatami (Yojōhan shinwa taikei, 2010), cet article illustre les différentes approches de la cohérence diégétique à l’intérieur de chacune de ces formations industrial-médiatiques. L’article s’inspire des concepts leibnitzien de compossibilité et d’incompossibilité pour dresser un cadre théorique permettant de comprendre les différences dans la création de mondes médiatiques. En lisant La galaxie Tatami comme un méta commentaire sur la pratique du media mix, l’article vise aussi plus généralement à développer les termes pour l’analyse d’oeuvres transmédiatiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it