Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently there has been considerable interest internationally in 'cultural routes' (or 'itineraries') as part of cultural heritage. These are known in some parts of the world as 'heritage trails' although in Australia this term tends to be used for shorter, more localised walks through historic areas. The Council of Europe led the way, establishing a program of European cultural routes that is managed from a specialised institute located in Luxembourg. The prograrn's first initiative IS the St Jacques de Compostela Route. This consists, in fact, of two itineraries that commence in central Europe, cross France, the Pyrenees and northwest Spain, and end at Santiago de Compostela, the famous Christian pilgrimage site of the Middle Ages. In the United States and Canada, efforts have been made to commemorate the 'Underground Railroad' - the route taken by slaves trying to reach freedom before the Civil War by protecting a series of key sites along its length. UNESCO is supporting the Silk Road Project for developing cultural heritage and cultural tourism along the traditional medieval silk trade routes between southeastern Europe and China.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".