MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W52929814 · doi:10.5220/0002253403140317

A NEW HYBRID GENETIC ALGORITHM FOR MAXIMUM INDEPENDENT SET PROBLEM

2009· article· en· W52929814 on OpenAlexaff
Saeed Mehrabi, Abbas Mehrabi, Ali D. Mehrabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrossoverGenetic algorithmHeuristicAlgorithmComputer scienceSet (abstract data type)MutationMathematical optimizationPopulation-based incremental learningOperator (biology)Meta-optimizationVariety (cybernetics)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, Genetic Algorithms (GAs) have been frequently used for many search and optimization problems. In this paper, we use genetic algorithms for solving the NP-complete maximum independent set problem (MISP). We have developed a new heuristic independent crossover (HIX) especially for MISP, introducing a new hybrid genetic algorithm (MIS-HGA). We use a repair operator to ensure that our offsprings are valid after mutation. We compare our algorithm, MIS-GA, with an efficient existing algorithm called GENEsYs. Also, a variety of benchmarks are used to test our algorithm. As the experimental results show: 1) our algorithm outperforms GENEsYs, and, 2) applying HIX to genetic algorithms with an appropriate mutation rate, gives far better performance than the classical crossover

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207