MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W53323940

Hand-Eye: A Vision-Based Approach to Data Glove Calibration

2000· article· en· W53323940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHand Gesture Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWired gloveComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)CalibrationFilter (signal processing)PersonalizationMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We describe a new method for data glove calibration that uses computer vision techniques to create a filter for individual customization of input obtained from the glove. Our major observation is that it is possible to create a linear correlation between the hand posture reported by the data glove and the observed posture of the hand itself. We use a feature-based computer vision system independently to extract information about hand posture from video images of a human hand that is using the data glove. We simultaneously collect the glove data for the same posture. Linear regression is used on the combined sets of reported data to establish a filter that customizes the data reported from the glove for an individual user. The filtered glove data is mapped onto a computer-generated image of the hands skeletal structure. We show by comparison that the computer-generated hand image exhibits a posture quite similar to that of the actual hand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHand Gesture Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207