Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Quality of service & security in wireless and mobile networks
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to Montreal, an old warm charm city with a unique mix of historical, natural and cultural offerings to satisfy your curiosity.The wireless communication and mobile networking industry is facing a phenomenal growth in the number of products and services available, which demand good performance. In such a scenario, Quality of Service takes a major role in ensuring application performance. Since current approaches to QoS do not consider user mobility, new architectures and mechanisms have to be devised. Security is also a great challenge in wireless and mobile networks, which are more prone to security threats. QoS can be integrated to security mechanisms to further strength the fight against attacks that impair performance in wireless and mobile networks.As Co-Chairs of the 1st ACM workshop on Quality of Services and Security for Wireless and Mobile Networks (Q2SWinet), we have done our best to provide you with a solid technical program for Q2SWinet 2005, which is being held jointly with the 8th ACM MSWiM 2005 Symposium, in Montreal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it