MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Schemes over fields

2010· book-chapter· en· W53918705 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueVieweg+Teubner eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneralityMorphismFocus (optics)Finite fieldType (biology)FiberBlock (permutation group theory)MathematicsField (mathematics)Pure mathematicsComputer scienceDiscrete mathematicsGeometryPhysicsGeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A very important special case are schemes that are of finite type over a field. Thus before we progress with the general abstract theory of schemes we focus in this and the next chapter on the case of schemes of finite type over a field (although some of the definitions and results are formulated and proved in greater generality). In fact this is also an important building block for the study of arbitrary morphism of schemes f : X → S because we have seen how we may attach to each s ∈ S its fiber Xs = f−1 (s) (4.8). Thus f yields a family of schemes over various fields and we may study f by first studying its fibers and then how these fibers vary.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.460
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it