Premenstrual Syndrome and Dysmenorrhea in Adolescents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PMS/PMDD is a pervasive problem with a significant impact on the quality of life of affected individuals. This condition most often begins in adolescence with the establishment of normal ovulatory menstrual cycles; however, the underlying pathophysiology has yet to be delineated. Prospective evaluation is key to the confirmation of the diagnosis before the initiation of pharmacotherapy, especially psychotropic therapies, due to the possibly harmful side effect profile for adolescents compared to adults. Similarly, dysmenorrhea is common in adolescents. Although the majority of cases are primary, the HCP must be vigilant to allow for early diagnosis and treatment of secondary causes, thereby preventing long-term sequelae of delayed diagnosis. Stepwise therapy for dysmenorrhea treatment is usually employed; the choice of therapy should account for contraceptive needs of the adolescent in addition to symptom relief. For both PMSS/PMDD and dysmenorrhea, most studies of therapy have been performed in adults and, as such, adolescent-specific trials are required to confirm applicability to this age group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".