MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract 738: Role of the Pulmonary Veins in Experimental Paradigms of Remodeling- Basic Science Associated Atrial Fibrillation

2007· article· en· W55189049 on OpenAlexaff
Masao Sakabe, Kristina Lemola, Katsuyoshi Chiba, Grigorios Katsouras, Akiko Shiroshita-Takeshita, Stanley Nattel

Bibliographic record

VenueCirculation · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiologyInternal medicineAtrial fibrillationAblationPulmonary veinAtrial tachycardiaHeart failureTachycardiaCatheter ablation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background : Pulmonary vein (PV) activity is crucial in some forms of clinical atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly paroxysmal lone AF. The precise importance of PVs in AF associated with structural heart disease is less clear. Some evidence suggests that PVs may be important for AF in experimentally-remodeled atrial substrates, e.g. atrial-tachycardia remodeling (ATR) and congestive heart failure (CHF)-induced structural remodeling, but contradictory findings also exist. This study assessed the role of PVs in canine remodeling-associated AF by evaluating the changes induced by PV-LA disconnection via encircling epicardial ablation. Methods: AF was induced before and after complete isolation of all PVs in dogs with: ATR induced by atrial tachypacing (400 bpm x 1 wk; with AV block and 80 bpm ventricular pacing to control ventricular rate, n=5); and CHF induced by ventricular tachypacing (VTP, 240 bpm x 2 wks, n=7). Electrophysiological measurements and AF mapping with 240 unipolar atrial electro-grams in both atria and all PVs were also obtained before and after PV isolation. Results ATR reduced atrial ERPs and ERP rate adaptation. The shortest AF cycle length (AFCL) in each ATR dog was recorded from PVs (mean 84±3 ms), but the mean AFCL in each of the PVs (range 97–103 ms) was not different from the mean AFCL at LA sites (98 –103 ms). PV ablation did not affect AF duration in ATR dogs (mean 284±265 pre- vs. 304±225 s post-ablation, P=NS), nor did it significantly alter RA or LA AFCL. In CHF dogs, ERPs and ERP rate adaptation were preserved. The shortest AFCL was recorded in PVs in 2 dogs (108,112 ms) and in the left side of Bachmann’s bundle in 3 (97–117 ms). PV ablation failed to alter AF duration in CHF dogs (mean 778±203 pre- vs. 644±206 s post-ablation), and increased AFCL in RA and LA slightly (10 –15%) but not significantly. Conclusions : Uncoupling of the PVs from the LA fails to significantly affect the AF substrate in 2 clinically-relevant animal paradigms of AF-promoting atrial remodeling. These findings suggest that in the presence of a favorable atrial substrate for AF the PVs are not needed for AF maintenance, and are consistent with clinical observations that complete PV isolation may not be essential for effective ablation therapy of all groups of AF patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculation→Same topicCardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments→French-language works237,207→