MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W55202971

Vision and objetives: a must for SMEs in the new economy

2000· article· es· W55202971 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
G. d' Ambiose

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2000
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBusiness Strategy and Innovation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessStrategic directionIndustrial organizationMarket economyMarketingEconomyEconomicsBusiness administration
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many new economy firms have emerged 10 answer the latest increasing needs of various kinds in today's global village. Are those firms different in their management from the more traditional ones? The owner-rnanagers of one hundred and eight Canadian SMEs participated in a study attempting to suggest some answers to the question. One of the central hypotheses for the study was that the level of performance of the firms was associated with the level of manifestation of the strategic vision of their owner-managers. The results confirm the presence of a strong strategic vis ion in the better performing traditional firms. They also indicate the pertinence of strategic vision in SMEs of the new economy. But there the evidence emerges differently. In this paper, the author contrasts both results and stresses important issues for the management of small and medium-sized enterprises operating especially in the new economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.007
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicBusiness Strategy and InnovationFrench-language works237,207