MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W55301714

Escrevendo a história do cancro : da situação historiográfica internacional ao caminho por trilhar em Portugal

2013· article· pt· W55301714 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Rui Manuel Pinto Costa

Bibliographic record

VenuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) · 2013
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldMedicine
TopicStoma care and complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Cancer InstituteMedical Research CouncilHarvard UniversityLiga Portuguesa Contra o CancroUniversidad de GranadaUniversidade de CoimbraPrinceton UniversityMcGill UniversityInstituto Nacional do Câncer, Ministério da SaúdeJohns Hopkins UniversityUniversity of OxfordKræftens Bekæmpelse
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privilegiando-se as abordagens de natureza historiográfica, este artigo pretende apresentar uma síntese dos mais relevantes autores e respectivos estudos sobre a temática da história do cancro, assunto que se encontra enquadrado no mundo mais lato da história da saúde e das ciências biomédicas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0070.016
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePortuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)Same topicStoma care and complicationsFrench-language works237,207