Duration of lactation, endocrine and metabolic state, and fertility of primiparous sows1,2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to determine factors affecting the reproductive performance of primiparous sows early weaned (EW; n = 35) at d 14 or conventionally weaned (CW; n = 35) at d 24 of lactation. Sow BW and backfat were recorded at farrowing, weekly until weaning, and at standing heat. Feed intake was controlled throughout lactation to standardize nutritional effects on subsequent reproductive performance. Litter size was standardized across treatments within 48 h after farrowing, and litter weight was recorded until weaning. In subsets of sows, blood samples were collected from 10 h before to 10 h after weaning, and then every 6 h until ovulation. Sows were heat checked twice daily and bred at 24-h intervals during standing heat using pooled semen. Ultrasonography every 6 h determined time of ovulation. Sows were either slaughtered within 24 h after ovulation to assess ovulation rate, fertilization rate, and embryonic development in vitro, or at d 28 of gestation to determine ovulation rate and embryonic survival. Compared with CW sows, EW sows had more backfat at weaning (15.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 14.7 +/- 0.5 mm; P < 0.001). Also, CW sows tended to lose more BW and to have lower IGF-I concentrations, indicating poorer body condition. Duration of lactation did not affect ovulation rate (EW = 17.6 +/- 0.7; CW = 18.7 +/- 0.6), fertilization rate (EW = 96.0 +/- 2.2; CW = 88.2 +/- 4.7%), or embryo survival to d 28 (EW = 62.5 +/- 4.5; CW = 63.1 +/- 5.0%). There was a marginal effect of duration of lactation on weaning-to-estrus interval (EW = 120 +/- 3; CW = 112 +/- 3 h; P < 0.06) and duration of estrus (EW = 52.4 +/- 2.3; CW = 46.3 +/- 2.2 h; P < 0.08). Overall, embryonic survival, not ovulation rate, seems to be the limiting factor for potential litter size in the second parity. Although fertility in both EW and CW sows studied was compromised, endocrine and metabolic data indicate that the mechanisms affecting reproductive performance may differ between the two weaning systems. The LH, FSH, and estradiol data from the EW sows are characteristic of animals with limited follicular development and incomplete recovery of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis; consequently, the integrity of the uterine environment may be adversely affected and limit embryonic survival. In CW sows, variability in metabolic state seemed to be the key factor limiting the fertility, again adversely affecting embryonic survival.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".