L'importance des facteurs humains dans les audits de securite: le cas de l'aeroport Montreal-Trudeau
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre du projet de reconfiguration du reseau routier en facade de l'Aeroport international Pierre-Elliot-Trudeau, un concept global autoroutier a ete elabore par CIMA+ en collaboration avec Aeroports de Montreal. En plus de relier les reseaux routiers local et superieur, ce concept integre un reseau pietonnier et cyclable permettant de repondre aux besoins des marcheurs et cyclistes qui circulent en facade de l'aeroport. Par ailleurs, le concept considere egalement l'amenagement d'un nouvel hotel, de nouveaux stationnements et d'un lien ferroviaire ainsi que tous les besoins associes aux activites aeroportuaires (taxis, autobus, livraison, etc.) Afin de bonifier le concept preliminaire, un audit en securite routiere a ete realise par une equipe multidisciplinaire composee de specialistes en securite, d'un expert en facteur humain et de responsables des installations aeroportuaires. Les conclusions de l'audit ont permis de mettre en evidence l'importance de considerer les facteurs humains dans la realisation des audits en securite routiere. (A) Pour la fiche generale du congres voir numero ITRD E216511.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.011 | 0.030 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".