Fonctions du mythe dans le cinéma italien de 1960 à 1975 : volonté de détour ou évasion illusoire ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Considere sur la double perspective de recit de la cosmogonie, d'histoire vraie des origines, et de recit legendaire, fabuleux et mensonger, le mythe trouve un terrain de predilection dans le cinema italien des annees soixante, en particulier chez Pasolini, Fellini, Visconti, Antonioni et les freres Taviani. L'impact de la seconde guerre mondiale developpe chez ces auteurs une tendance a vouloir redefinir les origines de la civilisation, a travers une destructuration du langage et une volonte de detour par l'Antiquite et par le mythe, afin de construire les bases d'une renaissance. L'expression poetique et le perfectionnement esthetique revelent une adhesion generale de ces auteurs au symbolisme et a la culture decadente, fondatrice des mythes de leur enfance. Hante par le spectre du neo-capitalisme, ce cinema expressionniste est caracterise par une tendance a l'introspection, afin de donner une analyse critique du mythe, et de decrypter la realite difficilement saisissable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".