MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W56100501 · doi:10.3233/jae-2004-621

Optimized thrust control of linear induction motors by a compensation approach

2004· article· en· W56100501 on OpenAlexaff
Konrad Woronowicz

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Motor Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsBombardier (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLinear induction motorThrustLinear motorCompensation (psychology)Control theory (sociology)Induction motorTracking (education)Control engineeringControl (management)Finite element methodVector controlEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a solution to the control problems that can be associated with the application of the linear induction motor (LIM) in urban transportation. In order to meet the principle objective of LIM control – the peak thrust tracking – a new compensation technique is presented. The control system has additionally been verified by use of the appropriate finite element field calculations of the LIM and measurements done on the test machine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.819
Threshold uncertainty score0.442

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and MechanicsSame topicElectric Motor Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207