Metropolitan Democracies: Transformations of the State and Urban Policy in Canada, France and Great Britain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Metropolitan cities at the crossroads of globalisation and changing politics, Bernard Jouve The transformation of citizenship and democracy at local and global levels, Jules Duchastel and Raphael Canet, translation by Stuart-Anthony Stilitz Contemporary cities and the renewal of local democracy, Pierre Hamel Partnerships and transformation of the state in urban Britain, Gordon Dabinett London: the Mayor, partnership and World city business, Peter Newman and Andy Thornley The contradictions of partnership: Sheffield from steel to urban regeneration, Philip Booth Toronto's reformist regime, municipal amalgamation and participatory democracy, Julie-Anne Boudreau Municipal reform and public participation in Montreal's urban affairs: break of continuity?, Anne Latendresse The fight for jobs and economic governance: the Montreal model, Jean-Marc Fontan, Juan-Luis Klein and Benoit Levesque Putting locally based management to the test in French public policy, Philippe Warin Participating in development: the case of a public open space in Villeurbanne in the Lyon conurbation, Jean-Yves Toussaint, Sophie Vareilles, Marcus Zepf, Monique Zimmerman, translation by Philip Booth Local democracy under challenge: the work of the Agora Association in Vaulx-en-Velin, France, Didier Chabenet, translation by John Tittensor Instituting proximity: the Arrondissements of Paris, Marseille and Lyon since 1983, Melody Houk Metropolitan democracies: from great transformation to grand illusion?, Bernard Jouve Index.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".