MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mehdi Mozaffari. Pouvoir shî’ite. Théorie et évolution. Paris-Montréal, L’Harmattan, 1998 (L’autre islam), 341 p.

2001· article· fr· W561526471 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yann Richard

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracta Iranica · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Studies and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesDecadenceIslamArtPhilosophyTheologyLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette thèse, soutenue à Paris au début des années 1970, était d’une grande originalité, clairvoyante, le premier travail de première main, dans une langue européenne, sur le chi’isme politique. Il fallait être prophète, à l’époque où les spécialistes de l’Iran parlaient de la décadence complète de l’islam, pour se pencher vers une tendance du chi’isme aussi opposée à celle que Henry Corbin faisait connaître à la même époque. L’évolution politique a donné raison à Mozaffari, qui a fait depuis ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.188

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracta IranicaSame topicIslamic Studies and HistoryFrench-language works237,207