Federalism, citizenship, and Quebec : debating multinationalism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acknowledgments 1 Introduction: Exploring Multinationalism 2 Historical Foundations and Evolving Constitutional Orders: The Politics of Contestation in Quebec Multinationalism and Diversity Constitution, Political Community, and Society The First Constitutional Order A Period of Transition: 1960s to 1982 A New Constitutional Order: Patriation in 1982 and the Social Union Framework Agreement Setting the Scene 3 The Federal Principle in Canada: Multifaceted Conceptions of Representation Understanding the Federal Idea Pre-Confederation: The Seeds of a Federal State Competing Federal Visions Conclusion 4 Distinct 'National Models' of Integration: Establishing Contexts of Choice Multiculturalism versus Homogeneous Citizenship 'Interculturalism': Quebec's Model of Cultural Pluralism Canada's Policy of Multiculturalism Concurrent Nation-Building Strategies Citizenship Discourse in Quebec: Societal Culture at Work 5 Citizenship and Democracy: Negotiating Membership The Political Sociology of Citizenship Multinational Democracies Citizenship and Multinationalism in Canada The Road Ahead 6 Contemporary Challenges and the Future of Canada Consolidation of the Present Constitutional Order The High Road Notes Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".