MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W562334570

The redefined role of the Ismaili Muslim woman through higher education and the professions

2004· book· en· W562334570 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2004
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Islamic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceAncient historyGender studiesHistoryReligious studiesSociologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Finally, the findings indicated that their higher education and their professional status had led to a significant change in these women's roles in society. They were now active participants in society, and able to challenge the political knowledge-validation processes that had externally defined, controlled and stereotyped them in the past. This study investigates the effects of higher education among Nizari Ismaili Muslim women, and its impact on traditional cultural mores regarding gender. It explores the lives of seven professional Canadian Ismaili women of Indian descent, from a hitherto traditional society, at different stages of their acculturation, and examines how higher education has affected their roles as Muslim women in society. Stories of the lives of the women's mothers also emerge through the voices of the participants. This is a qualitative study based on the narrative analyses of women whose cultural moorings are rooted in tradition. Primary sources for data collection included texts and in-depth interviews with women who shared a common background: their Indian descent, their colonial African connection, their Islamic faith, their quest for higher education, and their diasporic experiences. The data analyses took a thematic approach as patterns of life stories and relationships began to emerge. Findings. Results of this study showed that there was no essential Islamic or Ismaili woman, even though images based on various geopolitical movements tend to suggest so. The women of this study managed to extricate themselves from an otherwise patriarchically obsessed exegesis of the Qur'an on women's rights, solely by relying on the guidance of their Imams, who, in their persuasion of Islam, hold the authority and prerogative to interpret the faith according to the times. Other important variables that were implicated in their oppression were the British and other European colonial policies of racial discrimination, especially regarding educational opportunities. Their Imams worked proactively to counteract this problem. The study also shows that the practice of their faith and its manifestations are largely private. Their adherence to it was neither anachronistic, nor incompatible with their professional lives, though its form and symbols had changed for them compared to what it was for their mothers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.578
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it