MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W563349285

Salt Management Guide, Second Edition

2013· article· en· W563349285 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Christopher C. Gunter, B Hodgins, Thomas G. Plante

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationBusinessOrder (exchange)Environmental planningTransport engineeringEngineeringGeographyFinancePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With over one million kilometres of road, Canada's extensive network provides a safe, efficient and affordable means of surface transportation and supports a wealth of economic and social activities. Many individuals rely on the Canadian road network for transport to the workplace and a wide array of economic uses, for recreation and leisure activities, and for emergency and security services. The de-icer of choice continues to be salt. Since TAC's Salt Management Guide was published in 1999, advancements have been made in the field of salt management. In order to keep the Guide current, an update of the document was deemed necessary to incorporate the research and lessons learned in the past ten years. This Guide and the Syntheses of Best Practices continue to identify and described ways of handling and using salt to maintain its usefulness within winter maintenance while reducing its adverse effects to the environment. (A)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.619

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1680.136

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207