MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W564001223

MIKE'S BIG RAILROAD : REMEMBER THE LITTLE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN? NOW IT'S IN MEXICO, AND A TRANSCONTINENTAL PLAYER, TOO.

2003· article· en· W564001223 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fred W Frailey

Bibliographic record

VenueTrains · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransport and Economic Policies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipDebtAtlantaCalaisEconomyPolitical scienceGeographyBusinessFinanceArchaeologyEconomicsLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article details the expansion of the Kansas City Southern (KCS) railway from a small line to an operator with transcontinental and international ambitions. Starting in 1995, its new president Mike Haverty has stitched together different services and plans that have resulted in an Atlanta-California transcontinental corridor in partnership with Norfolk Southern and Burlington Northern Santa Fe, majority ownership of Mexico's largest railroad with the prospect of full ownership, and a partnership with Canadian National. The need to pay down debt to make the Mexico purchase possible has led to deferred investment in long-term capital projects such as switch automation and connecting up sidings on the convoluted transcontinental route. Key to its current prospects are a new Western terminal established in Dallas; an intermodal contract from Norfolk Southern, direct connections across the Mexico border and a subsidiary in Panama that allows KCS to ship freight from ocean containerships too large to pass through the canal. As KCS awaits developments from the major lines, it cultivates its presence in anticipation of making a good takeover candidate in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.285

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrainsSame topicTransport and Economic PoliciesFrench-language works237,207