Burnout Across Thirteen Cultures: Stress and Coping in Child and Youth Care Workers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Preface Basic Concepts Child and Youth Care Work: Past, Present, and Future Burnout: Its Impact and Precursors Culture as a Lens to Examine Burnout Process, Practice, and Culture Comparisons The Study: The People and the Process Thirteen Culture Comparisons Thirteen Cultures of Child and Youth Care: Who They Are and What They Do Culture and the Determinants of Burnout Pan-Cultural Analysis of the Impact of Environment, Coping, and Culture on Burnout Burnout Configurations Cross-Cultural Comparisons The United Kingdom--Scotland and England: One Country--Two Cultures Germany--Former East and Former West: One Country--Two Cultures Canada--French and English Speakers: One Country--Two Cultures East and West: Burnout and the Fall of the Iron Curtain Separated by a Common Language: Australia, Canada, England, Scotland, and the United States Themes and Recommendations Emerging Themes in Culture and Burnout Burnout Prevention, Remediation, and Recovery Implications for the 21st Century
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it