Vancouver Transportation Plan Update
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Like most major urban cities, the City of Vancouver has an overall transportation strategy. In January 1996, the City of Vancouver began a broad city-wide public engagement program that eventually led to the Council-approved Vancouver Transportation Plan in May 1997, nearly 15 years ago. While the plan was a great step forward for the City, most action items are completed and many of the targets were exceeded a decade ahead of schedule. Development of a new, longer range plan (Transportation 2040) is now underway to set the City's sights higher and farther ahead. This paper provides an overview of the regional context and original public process undertaken to complete the 1997 Vancouver Transportation Plan and summarizes some key related planning milestones over the years to follow. The paper then summarizes recent transportation monitoring results, highlighting the significant sustainable transportation progress that has been achieved over the last 15 years. Finally, the paper includes an overview of the development process for Transportation 2040, from its initiation in the Greenest City Action Plan and onward into developing the first active transportation implementation plan. An overview of the plan's goals and principles, as well as a summary of some of the top policies and actions, are included. (A) For the covering abstract of this conference see ITRD record number 201211RT334E.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.132 | 0.056 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".