Исходный материал для селекции овса на устойчивость к красно-бурой пятнистости, корневым гнилям и пыльной головне
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The studies were conducted in the years 2002-2012 in the taiga zone of Western Siberia. Soil test sites sodpodzolic. The humus content of about 2,0%. We studied breeding patterns, surveys and observations were made by the procedures adopted in academia. During the study the degree of injury of oat plants redbrown spot ranged from 4,3 to 76,0 %, epidemics of the disease was observed 1 time. The correlation coefficient between precipitation and infected plants was 0,97 ± 0,02, and between indicators of air temperature and infection of plants is equal to 0,79 ± 0,04. Select only one line of oats 5866/93 [ Horizon χ Metis ] as srednevospriimchivaya. Infection of oat plants root rot does not exceed 25%. As a source of stability we have proposed line 2737/90, 3663/91, 5252/95. Promising combination: [Irtysh χ Monar], [31N714 χ 20N816], [N1121 χ aurea 603]. Immunological monitoring of breeding material allowed us to estimate resistance to loose smut. In hybrid nurseries allocated: 1,1% level combinations lesions less than 5% 75,5% less than 25% 13,4 % less than 50% and 10,0 % of the samples with a strong susceptibility to loose smut 50 %. Have noted a combination of crossing, practical resistance to loose smut : Integrale χ Metis; Commander χ Metis, [(Horizon χ Metis) χ (Skakyn χ 4198/87 )] and [(Metis χ 81N444 ) χ (Komec χ 45N1007)]. In the control samples revealed the nursery with a high resistance 31,4 % practical 17,7 %, the average susceptibility 7,9%; weak 40,7 %, a strong susceptibility 2,3%. Isolated lines with 0 index of sustainability: 2476/97 (Borter χ 17N788 ); 3083/99 (Borter χ 20N816 ); 2514/97 (Irtysh 13 χ 17N788); 2858/02 (Jaak χ Metis). On the background of a provocative test of competitive allocated 43,8 % of the rooms that have a high degree of stability, 20,1% practical resistance, 25,6 % low susceptibility, 9,3% the average susceptibility, 1,2 % a strong susceptibility. Marked lines with a high degree of resistance : 2142/94 (Irtysh 13 χ Monar); 2302/98 (31N714 χ 20N816); 1958/98 (Borter χ 12H794), as well as samples that have defeated loose smut does not exceed 5 % 5252/95 (N1121 χ aurea 603); 1376/90 (Skakyn χ Metis); 3663/91 (Dryg χ 81N444).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".