Vers une prise en compte des changements climatiques dans la gestion de l'érosion côtière aux Îles-de-la-Madeleine (Affiche)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deux projets ont ete menes par le Laboratoire de dynamique et de gestion integree des zones cotieres (LDGIZC) et la Chaire de recherche en geoscience cotiere aux Iles-de-la-Madeleine soit “Caracterisation geomorphologique et sedimentologique des unites hydrosedimentaires de la baie de Plaisance et de Pointe-aux-Loups, route 199, Iles-de-la-Madeleine” pour le ministere des Transports du Quebec et “Marges de securite en erosion cotiere : evolution historique et future du littoral des iles de la Madeleine” remis au ministere de la Securite publique du Quebec. Les iles de la Madeleine ont ete choisi pour ces deux etudes etant donne sa sensibilite a l’erosion puisque 68% de ses cotes sont en erosion (LDGIZC, 2006). Situe dans le golfe du Saint-Laurent, l’archipel madelinien est fortement expose aux ondes de tempete. La vitesse de la hausse du niveau marin relatif est passe de 1,6 mm/an au cours des 600 dernieres annees a 3,5 mm/an depuis 1950 (Juneau, 2012). Ce contexte augmente la vulnerabilite des infrastructures cotieres, notamment la route principale, le seul lien entre les differents ilots rocheux qui est menacee a differents endroits. Cette problematique liee a l’erosion n’est pas prevue de diminuer en raison des changements climatiques apprehendes puisque les processus d’erosion devraient augmenter en raison d’une reduction de 60 a 70 % de la couverture de glace de mer (Senneville et Saucier, 2007), d’une hausse des tempetes effectives, d’une acceleration de la hausse du niveau marin (Vermeer et Rahmstorf, 2009; Koohzare et al., 2008) et d’une hausse des cycles gel-degel et des redoux hivernaux (Bernatchez et al., 2008).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".