MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W565530565 · doi:10.5771/9783845232195-19

Consequences and policy perspectives in the Nordic countries as a result of certain important decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU

2011· book-chapter· en· W565530565 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Niklas Bruun, Claes-Mikael Jonsson, Erland Olauson

Bibliographic record

VenueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEuropean and International Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceEuropean court of justiceEconomic JusticeHumanitiesLaw and economicsLawSociologyEuropean Union lawPhilosophyEconomicsEuropean unionInternational trade

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Die Rechtssachen Viking, Laval und Rüffert haben den EuGH vor außergewöhnliche Herausforderungen gestellt und eine Debatte über das Gleichgewicht zwischen wirtschaftlichen Grundfreiheiten und sozialen Grundrechten ausgelöst, die noch lang andauern wird. Ziel des vorliegenden Werkes ist, einen zukunftsweisenden Beitrag zu dieser Debatte zu leisten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.150
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.012
Scholarly communication0.0130.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG eBooksSame topicEuropean and International Law StudiesFrench-language works237,207