Redevelopment of the Roundabout in Acadie, Quebec. Reamenagement du rond-point de l'acadie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Situe dans un milieu fortement urbanise, au carrefour du boulevard de l'Acadie et de l'autoroute Metropolitaine (40), le rond-point de l'Acadie dans sa configuration actuelle ne repond plus aux attentes d'aujourd'hui. Son reamenagement en un veritable echangeur ameliore la fluidite de la circulation, ajoute des voies de service sans croisement et ameliore la securite des pietons et des usagers du transport en commun. La conception et la realisation des ouvrages d'art requis pour la nouvelle geometrie sont influencees par de nombreuses contraintes de maintien des deplacements, d'emprise restreinte, de services publics enfouis, de proximite d'habitations, de durabilite des ouvrages et d'integration architecturale globale du milieu. Les ouvrages d'art comprennent plus de 2 kilometres de murs de soutenement en plus de 4 ponts d'etagement dont les charpentes d'acier sont les elements vedettes du projet. Avec un rayon de courbure minimal de 37,1 metres, ces charpentes constituees de poutres en acier courbes repoussent les limites des geometries realisables jusqu'alors avec ce materiau.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".