Mosby's comprehensive review of practical nursing for NCLEX-PN examination
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1.Introduction for Students Preparing for the Licensure Examination 2. Review of the Basics: Trends in the United States and Canada, Nursing Concepts, and the Nursing Process 3. Pharmacology 4. Nutrition 5. Medical-Surgical Nursing 6. Mental Health Nursing 7. Maternity Nursing 8. Pediatric Nursing 9. Nursing Care of the Aging Adult 10. Emergency Nursing Comprehensive Examination I Answers and Rationales for Comprehensive Examination I Comprehensive Examination II Answers and Rationales for Comprehensive Examination II Appendices A NANDA-Approved Nursing Diagnoses and Definitions B NANDA Taxonomy I and Taxonomy II Nomenclature Conversion Classified by Human Response Pattern C Classification of Nursing Diagnoses by Gordon's Functional Health Patterns D Common Drug Interactions E Tables of Weights and Measures, Pharmacology and Clinical Calculations F Common Communicable Diseases
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".