MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W566244120

MARK IV TO DEVELOP A US "SUPERTAG"

2000· article· en· W566244120 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P Samuel

Bibliographic record

VenueRCC's public works financing · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTransportation Systems and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSwap (finance)InteroperabilityTollProtocol (science)Agency (philosophy)Transponder (aeronautics)Work (physics)TelecommunicationsComputer securityComputer scienceBusinessEngineeringFinanceWorld Wide WebSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mark IV Industries surprised many by putting out the news that it is developing a multi-protocol transponder (MP-tag) or supertag that will work in all the major electronic toll systems in North America. It will develop the tag out of its own resources. The MP-tag will embody three separate protocols: the Inter Agency Group E-ZPass, Mark IV's own proprietary system; the Federal Highway Administration's open standard sandwich protocol American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) v7/IEEE P-1455 and its subset Hughes ASTMv6 for trucking; and California Title 21 open standard. It is unclear as yet how the MP-tag will operate with the Amtech versus proprietary read-only systems in Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, and the Maritime provinces of Canada. The toll authorities could swap out the single-mode readers for dual-modes, or Mark IV and Amtech could cooperate. These will be relatively small issues to be resolved compared with the challenge of working out business arrangements for handling the increasing number of foreign transactions that interoperability will allow.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1060.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRCC's public works financingSame topicTransportation Systems and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207