Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment on papers presented at the Commerical Law and Human Rights Conference, Sir Anthony Mason human rights as legally binding or merely relevant?, David Kinley corporations and human rights, Stephen Bottomley the business case for human rights - the Amnesty International perspective, Rory Sullivan and Des Hogan human rights and global business, Robert McCorquodale human rights and transnational litigation - interesting points of intersection, Andrew Bell corporate governance and sexual harassment, Christine Parker and Leon Wolff the Human Rights Act 1998 and commercial law, James Strachan intellectual property and human rights, Sam Ricketson the rights to food, health and intellectual property in the era of biogopolies, Peter Drahos equality, freedom and democracy - tax law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Claire Young administrative law, commerce and human rights, John McMillan labour law and human rights, Phillipa Weeks nativ title in commercial practice - a question of human rights or risk management?, Bryan Horrigan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it