Bibliographic record
Abstract
Comment on papers presented at the Commerical Law and Human Rights Conference, Sir Anthony Mason human rights as legally binding or merely relevant?, David Kinley corporations and human rights, Stephen Bottomley the business case for human rights - the Amnesty International perspective, Rory Sullivan and Des Hogan human rights and global business, Robert McCorquodale human rights and transnational litigation - interesting points of intersection, Andrew Bell corporate governance and sexual harassment, Christine Parker and Leon Wolff the Human Rights Act 1998 and commercial law, James Strachan intellectual property and human rights, Sam Ricketson the rights to food, health and intellectual property in the era of biogopolies, Peter Drahos equality, freedom and democracy - tax law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Claire Young administrative law, commerce and human rights, John McMillan labour law and human rights, Phillipa Weeks nativ title in commercial practice - a question of human rights or risk management?, Bryan Horrigan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.028 | 0.014 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.024 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".