MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W566798652 · doi:10.20381/ruor-7502

A mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian approach for numerical simulation of mixing layers and uniformly sheared flow.

2000· dissertation· en· W566798652 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
R. Abdolhosseini

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2000
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMixing (physics)LagrangianEulerian pathMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Materials scienceMathematicsStatistical physicsComputer sciencePhysicsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The vortex-in-cell (VIC) method is applied for the prediction of the turbulent characteristics and flow development of the two-dimensional spatially growing mixing layer, the two-dimensional uniformly sheared flow and the three-dimensional uniformly sheared flow. The VIC method has the advantage that it requires less computational tune compared with the Lagrangian method. In the first part of thesis, the two-dimensional VIC method is validated by simulating a spatially growing mixing layer. The results show that the VIC method is capable of predicting the characteristics of the spatially growing mixing layers as well as the grid-free Lagrangian method. In the second part of thesis, the two-dimensional VIC method is used to simulate the uniformly sheared flow. In this new approach a combination of several adjacent mixing layers simulate the initial condition used to generate the uniformly sheared flow. Turbulent characteristics such as the mean velocity, the r.m.s. longitudinal and lateral velocity fluctuations and the Reynolds shear stress are predicted and compared with previous numerical and experimental works. In the third part of this work, three-dimensional simulation of uniformly sheared flows is performed as an extension of the two-dimensional simulation in order to take into account the effect of stretching which is a major contributor to turbulence production. The methodology is based on a mixed Lagrangian-Eulerian three-dimensional vortex-in-cell method. Histograms and two-angle probability distribution of the inclination angle of the vorticity vectors at the grid points with the horizontal plane indicate the presence of vortical structures at a 35°--40° angle with horizontal plane which is consistent with the results of Rogers and Moin (1987). The time evolution of the component energy ratios K11, K22 and K33 are calculated and compared with the previous works. Sensitivity to the numerical parameters is investigated and the results exhibited robustness to the numerical parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.905

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.148
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)Same topicComputational Fluid Dynamics and AerodynamicsFrench-language works237,207