Nation, ideas, identities : essays in honour of Ramsay Cook
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part One: The Role of Culture Ann Davis, The Nickle Arts Museum, University of Calgary: Much Ado About Something: A Brief Study of the History of Canadian Art Exhibitions Norman Knowles, University of Calgary: Christ in the Crowsnest: Religion and the Anglo-Protestant Working Class in the Crowsnest Pass, 1898-1918 Peter E. Rider, Canadian Museum of Civilization: Swiling and Newfoundland Identity Mary Vipond, Concordia University: Desperately Seeking the Audience for Early Canadian Radio Part Two: Nationalism, Racism, and the Canadian Question Marcel Martel: Hors du Quebec, point de salut: The Intellectual Liquidation of Minority Francophones in the Imagination of Nationalist Quebec, 1945-1969 Phyllis M. Senese, University of Victoria: Seduced by the Dark Side: Racism and Anti-Semitism in the Slipstream of Nationalism Part Three: Canadian Women Exercising Agency at Home and Abroad Gail C. Brandt, renison College, University of Waterloo: The Problem of 'Passivity' and Female Workers in the Quebec Cotton Industry, 1880-1910 Ruth C. Brouwer, University of Western Ontario: Standard versus Sisterhood: Dr Murray, President Kim and Distinctive Approaches to Medical Education at Ewa woman's University, Seoul, 1947-50 Michael D. Behiels: Native Feminism vs. Aboriginal Nationalism: The Native Women's Association of Canada's Quest for Gender Equality, 1983-1994 Part Four: Ideas and Their Impact Brian J. Fraser, University of British Columbia: James A. Macdonald and the Theology of the Regenerators, 1890-1914 Michael Horn, Glendon College, York University: The Concept of Academic Freedom in English Canada: 1919-1964 R. Douglas Francis, University of Calgary: The Anatomy of Power: A Theme in the Writings of Harold Innis Patrice A. Dutil, TV Ontario: 'Wanted: A Phoenix': Ramsay Cook and the Exhaustian of Ideas, 1960-68 Part Five: Native Voices: From New France to the Canadian Prairies Jose A. Brandao, University of Western Michigan: Ignored Voices: Nineteenth Century French Canadian Views of Iroquois-French Relations James Pitsula, University of Regina: The Indian Vote in Saskatchewan Elections Ramsay Cook: A Bibliography PhD Dissertations Supervised by Ramsay Cook.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".