Incidents of Violence and Verbal Abuse from Patients and Their Relatives against Nurses in Dokkyo Medical University Koshigaya Hospital
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to understand the nature and frequency of violence and verbal abuse toward nurses ina Japanese general hospital. Questionnaires concerning violence and verbal abuse against nurses were distributedto 440 nurses employed at a university hospital and a total of 438 nurses responded to the questionnaire.Over one third reported attempted incidents of violence, whereas further one quarter reported beingactually pinched, touched unnecessarily, or kicked. More than a half reported being yelled at, being complainedto unreasonably about a medical service, and experiencing overbearing voices. The most commonemotion experienced after facing violence or verbal abuse was embarrassment and discomfort, followed byanger. Nurses in the emergency and intensive care units and some surgical wards experienced higher levelsof violence and verbal abuse than those in other wards. These findings prove the urgent need for the developmentof preventive actions to address the problem of workplace adversity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it