MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W568918413

A journey through ruins : the last days of London

2009· article· en· W568918413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Wright

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Entomology and Zoology · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYardBoroughArt historyVisionDirtQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryEmpireFrench hornRumbleArtVisual artsApartmentArchaeologyAncient historyCartographyLawEngineeringSociologyGeographyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Going Back to Dalston: Preface to the Oxford Edition PART ONE: THE UNDEMOLISHED WORLD OF DALSTON LANE 1. Street-Corner Vision 2. Around the World in Three Hundred Yards 3. All Cats are Grey by Night 4. Down in the Dirt 5. Dalston Lane Becomes a Downland Track PART TWO: BRIDESHEAD AND THE TOWER BLOCKS 6. Brideshead Relocated 7. Abysmal Heights 8. Rodinsky's Place 9. An Unexpected Reprieve PART THREE: SCENES FROM THE PRIVATIZED CITY 10. The London Bus Queue Falls Apart 11. The Vandalized Telephone Box 12. The Man with a Metal Detector 13. Drinking Water in a Toxic State PART FOUR: TALES OF CONVERSION 14. The Park that Lost its Name 15. Remembering London's War 16. The Bow Quarter: Six Hundred and Seventy Luxury Flats in an Old Victorian Hell-House PART FIVE: VISIONS OF THE NEW DAWN 17. Excellence: From Fifth Avenue to Hackney Town Hall 18. Refounding the City with Prince Charles AFTERWARDS... 19. Down Among the Gentrifiers 20. A Night to Remember 21. Brick Lane's Day of Killing 22. Don Giovanni (and Business Planning) Come to the Hackney Empire 23. Siraj Izhar's public lavatory Notes Index

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.259

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0770.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Entomology and ZoologySame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207