Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article describes the successes of public transport in Perth, Western Australia (WA), a marked difference from the poor quality public transport experienced in Melbourne and Sydney. Public transport use in Perth has grown by 32% in the period 1992-2005 and bus services feed into the new urban rail link, the Mandurah line. The author explores how and why this success story happened in a city that had been dominated by urban freeways and road building for many years. He focuses on the role that community campaigning and action groups played in this transformation, as well as the shifting political support that eventually moved away from road building towards urban rail and integration. The author concludes that establishment of an integrated public transport authority with control over rail and bus (Transperth) was inspirational and brought Perth into line with successful European cities like Zurich and with Vancouver in Canada. The discussion emphasizes lessons learned in Perth that could be used to rescue the public transportation systems in Melbourne and Sydney. This article was previously published in D!SSENT Number 32, Autumn/Winter 2010.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it