MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W571077426

ORIGIN-DESTINATION TRAVEL SURVEY SOFTWARE: COGNITIVE AND TECHNOLOGICAL ASSISTANCE

2001· article· en· W571077426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Chapleau, Bruno Allard, M Trpanier, Catherine Morency, G Madituc

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPaceRelevance (law)Travel behaviorComputer scienceStructuringTransport engineeringData scienceSurvey data collectionTransportation planningTravel surveyKnowledge managementOperations researchBusinessEngineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a description of recently developed travel survey software which has been used in major mobility data acquisition surveys in the Greater Montreal Area (GMA). Mobility information obtained in such surveys forms the basis of critical technical activities such as transportation network planning, travel demand analysis and modeling, impact analysis and information dissemination to planners and network users. Classical uses of mobility data by transportation professionals are described. Contemporary issues are then presented, with a view to increasing interest in instruments which support renewed uses of mobility data. Large-scale travel surveys have played an important role in the planning culture of Montreal's transportation professionals for almost thirty years now. This culture has evolved at the pace of technological and methodological developments, and has constructed a large body of knowledge concerning residents' travel behavior over time. By carrying out a retrospective study of this evolution, we are able to define typical states of a technical era, called technological and cognitive spaces. Current applied knowledge and issues are a consequence of a succession of these spaces in time. In the GMA, the construction of detailed knowledge on mobility behavior has been based on observed trip information from travel surveys. These surveys serve as the interface for information transfer between users and planners. Concerns about mobility data quality, standards, effectiveness and relevance, as well as the availability of information technology, have led to the conception of tools to assist in data acquisition, validation and structuring, as well as uses of derived information. This subject merits a demonstration: evolving features and functions are illustrated through three types of Origin-Destination (O-D) survey software, specifically, the following: (1) onboard bys route O-D survey; (2) telephone-interviewed monthly pass O-D survey; and (3) large-scale regional telephone-interviewed household O-D survey. The relevance of the continuous large-scale telephone-interviewed household O-D survey has finally been addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicHuman Mobility and Location-Based AnalysisFrench-language works237,207