MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W571471913

ONTARIO PROVINCIAL POLICE SPECIALIZED PATROLS TRAILS AND WATERWAYS ENFORCEMENT - SNOWMOBILE ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE VESSEL ENFORCEMENT (S.A.V.E.) TEAMS

2002· article· en· W571471913 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
James Mcdonnell, Christine A. Hughes, L Lee-Davidson

Bibliographic record

VenuePROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Farm Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecreationLaw enforcementEnforcementUnit (ring theory)Recreational useTerrainBusinessTransport engineeringGeographyEngineeringEnvironmental planningPolitical sciencePsychologyLawCartography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This report will provide the background with regard to the problem of alcohol abuse in Ontario by some recreational vehicle users. Recreational vehicles include snowmobiles, vessels, and All- Terrain Vehicles (ATVs). The article will also illustrate the typical profile of individuals that engage in the abuse of alcohol while operating recreational vehicles. To address this serious problem, the Ontario Provincial Police received additional provincial funding in 2001 to form the Snowmobile ATV Vessel Enforcement (S.A.V.E.) Unit. The three SAVE teams are staffed with experienced OPP law enforcement officers and are located strategically in the Province. The specialized unit supplements the efforts of regular front-line police officers and focuses on the reduction and prevention of recreational fatalities through enforcement and educational presentations. (A) For the covering abstract of the conference, see ITRD Abstract No. E201067.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.173

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0520.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ALCOHOL, DRUGS AND TRAFFIC SAFETYSame topicAgriculture and Farm SafetyFrench-language works237,207