Bibliographic record
Abstract
Part 1 The context of families: new aspects of family relations, Eugenia Scabini dual images - the family in perspective, James S. Frideres adolescentology - youth, their needs, and the professions at the turn of the century, Leroy D. travis a meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of pornography, Elizabeth Oddone Paolucci, Mark Genuis and Claudio Violato parent-child interdependence in Chinese families - change and continuity, Qi Wang and Yeh Hsueh psychosocial factors influencing breastfeeding - a stepwise discriminant analysis employing a sample of Italian women, Aldo Zanon and Claudio Violato. Part 2 Family adjustment and transitions: spiralling up and spiralling down - a longitudinal study of adjustment, Christopher Bagley and Kanka Mallick what happens to the sibling subsystem following parental divorce?, Madeleine Beaudry, Marie Simard, Sylvie Drapeau and Cecile Charbonneau parental self-efficacy and characteristics of mother and father in the transition to parenthood, Wilma Binda and Franca Crippa from adolescence to young adulthood - a family transition, Margherita Lanz. Part 3 Child and adolescent development: regulation and its disorders, Diane Benoit children's and parent's perceptions of parental attitudes and behaviours pertaining to academic achievement, Jonathan Midgett, Laura Belsito, Bruce A. Ryan and Gerald R. Adams a stepswise discriminant analysis of delinquent and non-delinquent youth, Elizabeth Oddone-Paolucci, Claudio Violato and Chris Wilkes origins of psychopathology - a developmental model, Claudio Violato and Mark Genuis parallels between dyadic interactions - parent-child and child-peer, Leigh A. Moore, Darla J. Maclean and Thomas P. Keenan modern approaches to children's cognitive development, Carol Miles. Part 4 Attachment: attachment security to mother, father and the parental unit, Mark Genuis and Claudio Violato pilot study of the psychometric properties of the adolescent attachment survey (AAS), Mark Genuis, Claudio Violato, Elizabeth Oddone-Paolucci, Stephane Robitaille and Dawn McBride effects of non-maternal care on child development - a meta-analysis of published research, Claudio Violato and Clare Russell.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".