Curriculum in Today's World: Configuring Knowledge, Identities, Work and Politics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction 1. Curriculum in Today's World Lyn Yates, University of Melbourne, Australia and Madeleine Grumet, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US Section I: Curriculum and National/Global Identities 2. Dressing the National Imaginary Georgina Tsolidis, University of Ballarat, Australia 3. Nationalism, Anti-Americanism, Canadian Identity William F. Pinar, The University of British Columbia, Canada 4. Curriculum Polices in Brazil Elizabeth Macedo, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 5. Conceptualizing Curriculum Knowledge Berit Karseth and Kirsten Sivesind, Institute for Educational Research, University of Oslo, Norway Section II: Curriculum, the Economy and Work 6. Values Education amid Globalization and Change Jason Tan, National Institute of Education, Singapore 7. Preparing Students for the New World of Work Ann-Marie Bathmaker, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK 8. The Curriculum of Basic Education in Mainland China Miantao Sun and Jiang Yu, Shenyang Normal University, China Section III: Curriculum and Knowledge 9. Curriculum Policies for a Knowledge Society Michael Young, University of London, UK 10. Knowledge, Knowers and Knowing Ursula Hoadley, University of Cape Town, South Africa 11. Making Nothing Happen: Affective Life under Audit Peter Taubman, Brooklyn College, US Section IV: Curriculum Responses to Politics and Vulnerabilities 12. Images of the 'Other' in School Textbooks and Islamic Reading Material in Pakistan Tariq Rahman, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan 13. In the Search of Identity: Competing Models in Russia's Civic Education Anatoli Rapoport, Purdue University, US 14. Configuration of Knowledge, Identity, and Politics through the Current History Curriculum in Israel Eyal Nevah, Tel Aviv University, Israel 15. The Challenges of Writing 'First Draft History' Jeremy Stoddard, College of William & Mary, US, Diana Hess, University of Wisconsin -- Madison, US and Catherine Mason Hammer, College of William & Mary, US Afterword 16. The World in Today's Curriculum Madeleine Grumet, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, US and Lyn Yates, University of Melbourne, Australia
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.066 | 0.012 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".