An equivariant main conjecture in Iwasawa theory and the Coates-Sinnott conjecture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We formulate and prove an Equivariant Main Conjecture (EMC) for \it all prime numbers p under the assumptions \mu = 0 and the validity of the 2-adic Main Conjecture in Iwasawa theory citeWi. This equivariant version coincides with the version, which Ritter and Weiss formulated and proved for odd p under the assumption \mu=0 in citeRW2. Our proof combines the approach of Ritter and Weiss with ideas and techniques used by Greither and Popescu in citeGP2 in a recent proof of an equivalent formulation of the above EMC under the same assumptions ( p odd and \mu=0 ) as in citeRW2. As an application of the EMC we prove the Coates-Sinnott Conjecture, again assuming \mu=0 and the 2-adic Main Conjecture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it